Here is the date for the C-9, already in that set slot:
- P7944981-date.jpg (111.41 KiB) Viewed 219 times
- P47860133-tv.jpg (131.68 KiB) Viewed 219 times
- P47860133-1.jpg (130.11 KiB) Viewed 219 times
OT - Trade Challenge addendum
Forum rules
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.
OT - Trade Challenge addendum
One thing that bothered me was slot 29 of the Trade Challenge 50, 1877-CC. I put an major rarity in there, C-9. It has an RPD and RPM. However, there is the C-2.1 also that has a similar RPD, but a different date position. It also potentially has an MPD. It seems to be only scarce. To avoid misattributions, I will try to get the differences clear at the TPGs and just add to the set, a poor man's slot 29.
Here is the date for the C-9, already in that set slot:
Here is the TrueView for a C-2.1 I recently picked up. You can see the date is significantly shifted left of the position on the C-9.
and a detail shot of the 7/7:
There is also a potential MPD below and to the right of the first 7 in the denticles, but more higher grades examples need to be studies. TDITD; so it doesn't change anything.
Here is the date for the C-9, already in that set slot:
Here is the TrueView for a C-2.1 I recently picked up. You can see the date is significantly shifted left of the position on the C-9.
and a detail shot of the 7/7:
There is also a potential MPD below and to the right of the first 7 in the denticles, but more higher grades examples need to be studies. TDITD; so it doesn't change anything.