I think we can put the VAM 1E2 to rest as the the lower hair does not match the subject coin on the obverse and the neck-wing junction on the reverse is remarkably different-see images below.
In regard to VAM 11, it is true that the first 8 is temptingly close to the subject coin, but, the balance of the main obverse markers of VAM 11 preclude a solid match. They simply do not hold up to careful comparison. To take one example...the 2 of VAM 11 is doubled at the outside left, top & right of the upper loop. This is simply not the case for the subject coin which is only doubled at the right side of the ball. Result, a match to VAM 11 fails.
I am beginning to come to the conclusion that the subject coin is a new VAM, despite the close resemblance of VAM 15's date die cracks which I am now considering to be coincidental.
1882 VAM?
Forum rules
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.