1889-P VAM-38?.

johnhenry9009 · Post by **johnhenry9009** » Thu Jul 27, 2023 1:31 am

I want to say it is a V-7A Die Sequence # 1 but I don't think it is that. Do too the Die chip on the first 8. Any opinions?

: P1010691.JPG (238.1 KiB) Viewed 497 times

: P1010690.JPG (245.17 KiB) Viewed 497 times

: S20230726_0008.jpg (226.97 KiB) Viewed 497 times

: S20230726_0009.jpg (243.97 KiB) Viewed 497 times

: S20230726_0010.jpg (265.17 KiB) Viewed 497 times

PacificWR · Post by **PacificWR** » Thu Jul 27, 2023 2:43 am

Not a VAM-7A. Date position is wrong, no dot on R of "LIBERTY". On your coin, note the over polished lower hair by the designer's initial and check and see if you have a double ear. On the Reverse, no die clashing is apparent (this is a clue to what VAM you have).

johnhenry9009 · Post by **johnhenry9009** » Thu Jul 27, 2023 4:09 am

VAM-36? and thank you I should hove looked further in to it first

: S20230727_0002.jpg (105.02 KiB) Viewed 482 times

: S20230727_0005.jpg (138.11 KiB) Viewed 482 times

ljs123 · Post by **ljs123** » Thu Jul 27, 2023 1:27 pm

Not 36
Wrong date location for VAM-36

johnhenry9009 · Post by **johnhenry9009** » Thu Jul 27, 2023 2:38 pm

I have no idea why I said it was a VAM-36

. But it appears to be a V-38

PacificWR · Post by **PacificWR** » Fri Jul 28, 2023 3:40 am

That's ok. It is a VAM-38.

ljs123 · Post by **ljs123** » Fri Jul 28, 2023 2:04 pm

johnhenry9009 wrote: ↑
Thu Jul 27, 2023 2:38 pm
I have no idea why I said it was a VAM-36 . But it appears to be a V-38

No worries.
It happens to lots of us.

VAMWorld 2.0

1889-P VAM-38?.

1889-P VAM-38?.

Re: 1889-P VAM-? with Double clash.

Re: 1889-P VAM-? with Double clash.

Re: 1889-P VAM-36? with Double clash.

Re: 1889-P VAM-38? with Double clash.

Re: 1889-P VAM-38?.

Re: 1889-P VAM-38? with Double clash.