I have only been looking at VAMs for a couple years and a lot of the ones I attributed early on have turned out to be wrong. I had some time this weekend and was going back through some to see if I had gotten them right. I have an 01 O that I labeled as VAM 65 and was surprised to not find the page. It had been moved to the dubious pile.
I think I may have the un-clashed version. If not, I don't know which it is.
I look forward to your thoughts.
Jonnie
1901 O VAM 65 "2 for 1" dubious listing
Forum rules
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.
-
DurhamJnKY
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:16 pm
1901 O VAM 65 "2 for 1" dubious listing
- Attachments
-
- 1901 O V 65 Reverse 1.jpg (229.9 KiB) Viewed 275 times
-
- 1901 O V 65 Leg gouge.jpg (307.41 KiB) Viewed 275 times
-
- 1901 O V 65 Olive branch.jpg (250.43 KiB) Viewed 275 times
-
- 1901 O V 65 Arrowheads.jpg (278.76 KiB) Viewed 275 times
-
- 1901 O V 65 Eagle head.jpg (320.77 KiB) Viewed 275 times
-
DurhamJnKY
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:16 pm
Re: 1901 O VAM 65 "2 for 1" dubious listing
And the Obverse has plenty of interesting pick up points.
- 1901 O V 65 Obverse 1.jpg (220.54 KiB) Viewed 273 times
- 1901 O V 65 Nose & lips.jpg (268.21 KiB) Viewed 273 times
- 1901 O V 65 Bolls.jpg (201.43 KiB) Viewed 273 times
- 1901 O V 65 Cap & Fold.jpg (192.74 KiB) Viewed 273 times
- 1901 O V 65 Leaf & Hair.jpg (207.96 KiB) Viewed 273 times
Re: 1901 O VAM 65 "2 for 1" dubious listing
It was moved because it hadn't been observed. It doesn't mean it doesn't exist. That said, the die polishing lines on your coin need to match those shown on the 65A page (and those on a 65A coin that aren't shown) exactly for it to be considered to be VAM 65. I can't tell from here if they do.
Welcome to the VAMWorld 2.0 discussion boards. R.I.P. old VAMWorld.
-
DurhamJnKY
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:16 pm
Re: 1901 O VAM 65 "2 for 1" dubious listing
Thanks for the info. I'll add it to the pile heading your way.messydesk wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 11:41 pmIt was moved because it hadn't been observed. It doesn't mean it doesn't exist. That said, the die polishing lines on your coin need to match those shown on the 65A page (and those on a 65A coin that aren't shown) exactly for it to be considered to be VAM 65. I can't tell from here if they do.