Page 1 of 1

yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2022 12:33 pm
by DHalladay
Holder errors are fun. Most can be understood to some degree, like when 1883 gets keyed in as 1888, or one of the digits in the serial number prefix is typed in slightly wrong, or a mint mark gets overlooked.

But this holder error is ridiculous:

small 35884604 obv.jpg
small 35884604 obv.jpg (183.87 KiB) Viewed 794 times
small 35884604 LFCP obv.jpg
small 35884604 LFCP obv.jpg (326.74 KiB) Viewed 794 times

The date on the holder (1887-P) and the actual date of the coin (1921-P) are miles apart. So are the serial number prefixes (7172 is correct for 1887-P, but 7296 is correct for 1921-P.)

I can't help but wonder if there's an 1887-P somewhere out there in a PCGS MS64 holder that says 1921-P.

This coin is a VAM 1Y, by the way.

Re: yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:02 pm
by Windycity
I too collect PCGS slab errors... here's my favorite.

Image

Re: yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2022 1:05 pm
by DHalladay
VG10... that's hysterical!! :lol: :lol:

Re: yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2022 6:10 pm
by mikev50
here's an ngc "oops"
M1878V190a7a - Copy.JPG
M1878V190a7a - Copy.JPG (165.39 KiB) Viewed 758 times
M1878V190a7b - Copy.JPG
M1878V190a7b - Copy.JPG (160.19 KiB) Viewed 758 times

Re: yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 9:04 pm
by impairedsquirrel
Well... they both have... uhhh... ummm... a one?

Re: yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2022 1:01 am
by JackBnimble01
:o

Re: yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2022 2:22 am
by JohnGoldsmith
Looks OK here. Maybe the VAM attribution department put the label on it.

Re: yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 12:00 am
by fogie
My favorite has to be an ANACS oops (Vintage). Any more you need to get up pretty early to catch ANACS like this.
1878-PV17-2obv.jpg
1878-PV17-2obv.jpg (168.73 KiB) Viewed 603 times
1878-PV17-2rev.jpg
1878-PV17-2rev.jpg (157.29 KiB) Viewed 603 times

Re: yet another PCGS "oops"

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2022 12:07 am
by fogie
less surprising...
1888-OV9-6026-obv.jpg
1888-OV9-6026-obv.jpg (118.5 KiB) Viewed 602 times