Here is a 3rd example of a 1921-D that PCGS has attributed as a VAM 1A TRU_T that is so not it's ridiculous.
The first two I showed in recent months were jokes because they both still very clearly have most of the S showing:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6439&hilit=PCGS
But this one... well, it takes attribution ineptitude to a whole new disturbing level.
bashing PCGS yet AGAIN
bashing PCGS yet AGAIN
Last edited by DHalladay on Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:13 pm, edited 3 times in total.
When in doubt... don't.
Re: bashing PCGS yet AGAIN
It is going to get to the point where VAMs are going to need VARslab confirmation stickers on the backs of the slabs to confirm the attributions (like CAC for the grades) to be market acceptable. I am sure @messydesk wouldn't complain.
- SilverToken
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2021 2:17 pm
Re: bashing PCGS yet AGAIN
I agree with my friend... "When in doubt... don't".... especially on a professional level!
When it's no longer fun, I think I'm done!