1898-P far date?

General discussion board about VAMs, but no buy/sell offers
Post Reply
keilg1
Posts: 492
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

1898-P far date?

Post by keilg1 » Mon May 09, 2022 2:42 pm

As I look at the described varieties, there are only near, normal and slanted (normal) dates - but none listed as far. Might have some slant to it, but none of the slanted dates are (apparently) as far.

Do I read the date placement correctly as far? If not, none of the other pictures look to be 'as far' as this one. No other discernable PUPs that I can see that'd help identify a relationship to other dies.

Can't even say someone removed an O or S mintmark because none of those mints produced far date coins either, right? (No scratches to suggest otherwise... I'm just letting my creative detective mind go wild... ;-).

A headscratcher, but it doesn't take much for me to reach that state.

Thanks,

Gary
FCO.jpg
FCO.jpg (256 KiB) Viewed 750 times
FCR.jpg
FCR.jpg (256 KiB) Viewed 750 times

User avatar
Mike7E
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 12:01 am

Re: 1898-P far date?

Post by Mike7E » Mon May 09, 2022 4:04 pm

This looks like it is at RE3 LE5 that is at the extreme of Normal Date.

DurhamJnKY
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:16 pm

Re: 1898-P far date?

Post by DurhamJnKY » Mon May 09, 2022 4:13 pm

Have you looked at 14?

keilg1
Posts: 492
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: 1898-P far date?

Post by keilg1 » Mon May 09, 2022 5:06 pm

Thanks, @DurhamJnKY.

Mine looks even a little further right. I can't make out the doubling of the 8 but the 14 was a good start and might prove to be it in the end.

Here's a low resolution of the date but more up close:
1898-P far date up close.jpg
1898-P far date up close.jpg (58.54 KiB) Viewed 738 times
Gary Redfeather, PhD, RPh

https://www.linkedin.com/in/drgarykeil/

Click https://gjkeil2-82005.medium.com/our-lo ... 485d6cf0a5 to read the backstory of my surname change

User avatar
LateDateMorganGuy
Posts: 917
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:11 am

Re: 1898-P far date?

Post by LateDateMorganGuy » Mon May 09, 2022 7:20 pm

Couple of ways to look at this.

The date is in the normal position, albeit right within normal. Personally, I wouldn't even call it far right within normal.

That being said, as a normal date and no other listable markers, I would call it a VAM-1.

But, with 5.9M coins minted and only 14 base VAMs listed, it could be a candidate for a new listing, even if it is VAM-1 Die Pair 1.

keilg1
Posts: 492
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 4:36 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: 1898-P far date?

Post by keilg1 » Tue May 10, 2022 5:34 pm

Thanks @LateDateMorganGuy. That's one of the many things I love about this subjective hobby: what is normal in one series is not normal in another; what is slanted in one isn't in another; but all of them are somehow attractive and I want them in my set...

#I'mnotanaddict

;-)

blh74
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 1:28 am

Re: 1898-P far date?

Post by blh74 » Tue May 10, 2022 10:42 pm

In the VAM book Leroy has only three dies listed as near date.

Post Reply