1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
Forum rules
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.
1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
VAM 3AA has been revised.
VAM 3FU has been killed.
VAM 3HR is new.
VAM 35A has been revised
I disagree with the VAM 1 attribution, it has many listable PUPs.
I'm stunned I didn't self-attribute the others.
VAM 3FU has been killed.
VAM 3HR is new.
VAM 35A has been revised
I disagree with the VAM 1 attribution, it has many listable PUPs.
I'm stunned I didn't self-attribute the others.
When in doubt... don't.
Re: 1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
Congrats on combining 3AA and 3FU, and congrats on the 3HR!
Well, you were saying that you didn't have an actual VAM 1 before, so now perhaps you do. And like perhaps like other date/mintmark combinations this VAM 1 can be unique and not (yet) a generic term.
Well, you were saying that you didn't have an actual VAM 1 before, so now perhaps you do. And like perhaps like other date/mintmark combinations this VAM 1 can be unique and not (yet) a generic term.
Re: 1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
Congrats on your new DC, revisions and kill. I'll take care of the VAM pages for you. Is this your last package from LVA?
Re: 1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
Yes, this is my last package.
Discovery credit goes to Fogie, by the way.
When in doubt... don't.
Re: 1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
Nice works as always Dennis.
I see the 35A revision.
I have mentioned this before, and now seems a good time to remind others about the 35B clashed I.
I believe that the listing sequence does not match the striking sequence. It is my belief that 35B was struck first, the obverse die was changed out, then 35 was struck, and finally 35A.
For what it's worth, because I don't see anything about this on the pages.
Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

I see the 35A revision.
I have mentioned this before, and now seems a good time to remind others about the 35B clashed I.
I believe that the listing sequence does not match the striking sequence. It is my belief that 35B was struck first, the obverse die was changed out, then 35 was struck, and finally 35A.
For what it's worth, because I don't see anything about this on the pages.
Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Re: 1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
Lee:ljs123 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 4:21 pmNice works as always Dennis.
I see the 35A revision.
I have mentioned this before, and now seems a good time to remind others about the 35B clashed I.
I believe that the listing sequence does not match the striking sequence. It is my belief that 35B was struck first, the obverse die was changed out, then 35 was struck, and finally 35A.
For what it's worth, because I don't see anything about this on the pages.
Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
![]()
Thanks for the reminder. With John & John now heading things, this is one of many 1921-P topics that need to be revisited. Maybe we can gang up on them together?
When in doubt... don't.
Re: 1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
I would be happy to help if I can.
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 4:04 pm
Re: 1921-Ps from LVA: 1 kill, 1 new, 2 revised
The new VAM pages and revisions pages have been updated.