Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

General discussion board about VAMs, but no buy/sell offers
Post Reply
User avatar
raynat3
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu May 31, 2018 1:44 am

Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

Post by raynat3 » Sat Dec 21, 2019 5:14 pm

Was wondering about very low grade varieties that the letter transfer is not visible, however many of the clashes that are only present on the particular variety can be seen. Would it still be AOH as the variety?

DHalladay
Posts: 1207
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 4:38 pm

Re: Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

Post by DHalladay » Sat Dec 21, 2019 5:45 pm

Knowing how good J.R. is, the answer is "probably yes."
When in doubt... don't.

User avatar
TheYokel
Posts: 1542
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 12:23 am
Location: Death Valley (seriously)

Re: Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

Post by TheYokel » Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:07 pm

raynat3 wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2019 5:14 pm
Was wondering about very low grade varieties that the letter transfer is not visible, however many of the clashes that are only present on the particular variety can be seen. Would it still be AOH as the variety?
Does the letter in question define the VAM? Or just a part of the overall?

I mean to say that a VAM like the 89-O 24A is defined by the "N"... No "N"... No VAM-24A in my mind.

Conversely if the 89-O 1A1 were missing the "t" being transferred/worn on a particular example... I would think it would still get the label.
"There is no E"...

Top 100: 27 -- Hot 50: 6 -- Top 50: 4 -- Elite 30: 2 -- K12: 2

User avatar
raynat3
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu May 31, 2018 1:44 am

Re: Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

Post by raynat3 » Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:35 pm

It’s the 87-O 30A. The clash above Dollar in leaves shows enough to know what it is.

User avatar
TheYokel
Posts: 1542
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 12:23 am
Location: Death Valley (seriously)

Re: Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

Post by TheYokel » Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:13 pm

raynat3 wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:35 pm
It’s the 87-O 30A. The clash above Dollar in leaves shows enough to know what it is.
I feel like there needs to be a special designation for P/G coins that are able to be attributed, but missing many of the sought-after details on the coin. Feels kind of weird seeing a "WOW" coin labeled as such but missing the "WOW", so to say, lol...

TDITD, but I feel like there is a point of diminishment (is that a word?... Is now...) where just because we know what it is, doesn't mean it should qualify, if that makes sense?

Would be like seeing a 83-O labeled as a 22A because the ear chip and cap clash is visible but the reverse has been worn smooth and the E is missing...

Something like "Attributed But Not On Label" or something.

I dunno. Coffee ramblings while getting ready to make gingerbread houses with the foster kids... Ignore me lol.
"There is no E"...

Top 100: 27 -- Hot 50: 6 -- Top 50: 4 -- Elite 30: 2 -- K12: 2

User avatar
ljs123
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:16 pm

Re: Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

Post by ljs123 » Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:23 pm

Good question Ray.
My opinion is that if there is a marker that only that known clashed VAM has (different from the base VAM), then it would be attributed as such even if you could not see the transfer.

User avatar
alefzero
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2018 2:33 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Re: Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

Post by alefzero » Sat Dec 21, 2019 10:37 pm

It can get dicey though. Think of the 1889-O VAM-20B vs VAM-20A. HAd Leroy not chosen to list VAM-20B, they would be VAM-20.

User avatar
vampicker
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2018 1:48 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Low grade attribution on ANACS holder

Post by vampicker » Sat Dec 21, 2019 10:49 pm

When I know the clashed version is always a particular VAM. it will get that designation. This is particularly true when the unclashed stage is fairly rare, like the 1878 VAM 14.1
often the crusher of hopes and dreams

Post Reply