1880 O PCGS 62 VAM 6D Top Pop?

General discussion board about VAMs, but no buy/sell offers
Forum rules
All posts to this forum must abide by the posting rules. Continued posting to any VAMWorld forum constitutes acceptance of the rules.
Post Reply
User avatar
lioncutter
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 4:28 pm
Location: Lexington, Kentucky

1880 O PCGS 62 VAM 6D Top Pop?

Post by lioncutter » Sun May 28, 2023 5:45 pm

My recent find of a VAM 6D got me to looking at the top pops of the TPG's. When I view the PCGS top pop of this VAM, it does not look to be VAM 6D. It has a clashed reverse and VAM 6D should not have a clashed reverse according to listing. I could be wrong but tell me if I am right about this attribution. It looks like it could be VAM 6C. The one I am referring to is the first one that shows as PCGS 62. The second PCGS 62 looks to be correct.
https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/188 ... ges/518488
I may not be the best, but I do not know anyone better.

User avatar
fogie
Posts: 1392
Joined: Thu May 31, 2018 9:45 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: 1880 O PCGS 62 VAM 6D Top Pop?

Post by fogie » Sun May 28, 2023 7:50 pm

PCGS screws up too! (Just in case you had not noticed...) :D
Have a great day!

User avatar
lioncutter
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 4:28 pm
Location: Lexington, Kentucky

Re: 1880 O PCGS 62 VAM 6D Top Pop?

Post by lioncutter » Sun May 28, 2023 11:13 pm

fogie wrote:
Sun May 28, 2023 7:50 pm
PCGS screws up too! (Just in case you had not noticed...) :D
They all screw up at some point but that is a high dollar mistake. Also, if you look down at one of the PCGS 58 on that same page I linked, it is not a VAM 6D.
Talking about PCGS screw ups, I do have a 1891 O PCGS 55 attributed as VAM 1A that is actually VAM 3A1. Now, that is a hard one to screw up.
I may not be the best, but I do not know anyone better.

Post Reply