VAMWorld 2.0

Many thanks for your input John and John.

After looking at photos of the 50 highest auction price 1892-S at Heritage, I think this is going to be a new VAM and I think the broken star between DOLLAR and AMERICA on the reverse is why. I found a duplicate of my coin, including small obverse and reverse cracks that I hadn't noticed on my coin ...

Not sure I see any doubling on the date. If there is some it's awfully minor.

And there's something I hadn't noticed before – the star between AMERICA and DOLLAR looks to have had a chunk break out of the die between two of the points near the rim:

Tekkie1:
Thanks for the input. I'll add it to my next LVA batch and post the results here when they become available.

I hope this is big enough.
And guess what... circulated used-to-be PLish coins don't photograph worth a darn.

How big am I allowed to make photos here on the new site?

VAM 4 is the one I looked at longest too.

I've looked at every VAM attribution page twice and still can't be sure about this one; can anyone help? Date position looks like it is far. Date looks slanted. Mint mark looks to be positioned low. Two other interesting things: – Coin looks like it was at least semi-PL when new. (PCGS-45 now). – Th...

XF45 (has a shot at AU), but the obverse looks polished.

The 1921-P VAM 14A designation was eliminated, apparently in 2017, but then expanded to 14A1, 14A2, and 14B. The current attribution page for 14A1 has a photo showing a partially/mostly filled R in TRUST, with a caption saying, "at least one example of this variety shows a grease-filled "r" in "Trus...

Thank You!
And it's a 14.15?

No right click function on a Mac, and I did try pasting the web address into a new tab window.

I cut and pasted into a new window and got this:

We looked everywhere.
Looks like this page is missing. If you still need help, visit our help pages.

Both links are dead as a stump for me.

Yay John! You've reached the top.
Or is it the bottom?

John:
This 53 is nicer than I could have hoped for, buying sight unseen and all. It looks like a bunch of raw coins that got sold as "B.U." that I saw a couple of years ago that someone got royally hosed on. It also cost less than half of what you almost bid.

Thank you!
And it is a 2, rather than a 7.

Just got an 1892-S in PCGS AU53 that... well, AU-anything for that date is expensive. But things get very carried away above that. Seller's pixs didn't show how VERY lustrous the coin is (what a relief!), but they were good enough for me to see this:

Thanks VERY much for your time and effort on this!!