VAMWorld 2.0

Congrats – and thanks! – to all three of you for the time, effort and sharing of coins and information to make this research possible. It's collaborations like this whose importance helps not only collectors today, but those in the future for decades to come. Thanks Dennis. I sure do appreciate it....

Just finished going over my 1889-P VAM-23B Die Sequence #4 (single clash) collection and all 14 have the faint clash to n, left & right wreath clashes and the clash to G in "GOD". I also completed going over Die Sequence #5 (double clash) and a couple had a faint clash to the G in "GOD", but none ha...

Post has been updated.

I want to start this post by saying a big time thank you to two VAMWorld members for their help in collecting the facts for this post. They are andywoj00 and SilverToken. The Reverse VAM description for the 1889-P VAM-23A list, “No die clash marks on reverse die very unusual, especially for such str...

Roger, Thank you for all of your hard work. It sure has helped me in my research. A job well done.

Way to go Dennis. Very nice.

Congrats on your new DC.

Count me in Roger.

Nice work Roger. Makes one wonder what would have been said if there had been reports on the 1889-P VAM-23A.

Take a look at VAM-43A.

What do you need to have added?

Nice VAM-45 Andy. Glad to see the VAM page updated.

Thank you. Finding the first Reverse clashed 1889-P VAM-23B changes the narrative of the VAM-23 Series and reenforces the proven facts of the VAM-7 Series. We now have proof that the Reverse die was clashed (Die Sequence #2) without any signs of Obverse clashing and we now know this happened before ...

You are welcome. Nice photos by the way.

You have a VAM-43A. Nice pick.

Thanks Rod. Finding The first Reverse clashed 1889-P VAM-23B since it was discovered in 2000 and the 1889-P VAM-23A since it was discovered in 1997 is an early Christmas present. It really does change the narrative. It makes no difference to me if the Reverse VAM-23B description is revised or not, b...

Thanks Dennis. Think this changes the narrative on the Reverse Die for the 1889-P VAM-23A and VAM-23B

The Reverse VAM description for the 1889-P VAM-23A list, “No die clash marks on reverse die very unusual, especially for such strong die clash marks on obverse.” and for the 1889-P VAM-23B, “Die not changed since no die clash marks appeared, except for very faint vertical line at n of In. Die fields...

Happy Thanksgiving!

The 1900-S VAM-3 page has been updated. I do agree that VAM-3A does not exist.