VAMWorld 2.0

I have a 2021 Morgan with a small CUD on the obverse I would like to submit, but I can't find an email address to the administrator or proper area of this site for submission. Thank you for your help in advance. The 2021 Morgan and Peace dollars are not eligible to be listed as VAMs, as they are co...

fogie wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:28 pm

Thank You!

I agree with VAM 67. The mint mark is encroaching on high, but calling it something new without seeing how it's different from VAM 67 would risk creating a listing that stands a good chance of needing to be deleted.

Start with the date and mint mark before looking elsewhere. The S/S is machine doubling, so ignore that. The 882 in the date has legitimate doubling around the tops of the digits and the first 8 looks to have doubling on the inside left surface of the upper loop. That should get you far. The base of...

Add the Central States one for this Thursday-Saturday.

Thursday 10-7, Friday 10-6, Saturday 10-4. Admission $5/day, $10/3-days. Free parking. Something like 700 restaurants within about 5 miles.

Perfect! VAM 14 needs to be listed under the pitted dies guide. Thank you. Best not to rely on the extra guides to find things. Many are good, but they aren't consistently maintained. The wiki has a good search engine that can help find things quickly. Search for "1883-P" (in quotes) and pitting an...

1. The cracks you show aren't a match for VAM 1B.
2. Whatever the VAM, I don't see anything warranting listing separately in the pictures.

Anyone else going to this show?

I would like to pose a "Trade Challenge". The two parties involved with this squabble should talk on the phone and do this behind the iron curtain. We are. It is not as much of a disagreement as it may appear to be. BTW, I did check that 1873 VF proof. It weighs out consistent with a genuine Trade ...

ljs123 wrote: ↑

Mon Apr 25, 2022 2:30 am

messydesk wrote: ↑

Mon Apr 25, 2022 1:52 am

Looks like a planchet defect below the E to me.

What about the VAM JB?
I’m not feeling VAM-4.

I see the doubled serifs on the S of VAM 4, so I don't have a reason to say it isn't VAM 4. 86-S only has a few VAMs listed. A die study might show there are multiple obverses with that reverse.

Looks like a planchet defect below the E to me.

Probably was PL. I think most VAM 15s are.

Looks like a challenge, indeed. Thanks for sharing this!

I would be remiss if I didn't point out that you didn't wait long to make the first typo -- on the top of page 1 (after the ToC) in big letters.

vamsterdam wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 20, 2022 11:12 pm

I have a table but don’t know the number

You're at table 1417

Last two pictures were enough. It's VAM 52A.

They have a higher volume than they can handle. I imagine their jobs board is pretty full at the moment.

Finally got caught up with these. VAMs 131 through 143 and VAM 18B.

I'll be at table 805 Thursday through Saturday.

A new way, indeed. Usually, they put the tape over the front of the coin.

Short answer: No

Long answer: No VAMs for modern Morgans

Thanks for pointing it out.