VAMWorld 2.0

Last coin posted appears to be VAM 1a4, not seeing the swelling beginning above the olive branch leaves.

Going to be some disappointment here... https://www.ebay.com/itm/175505127252?h ... SwjmNjgTrr and here... https://www.ebay.com/itm/185672224356?h ... AAOSwjgTx6

Nice pick, hard to find many long nocks anymore in the wild. Congrats!

I guess this is what threw me off / from initial posting above..... " The new Vam 1B4C OB is unchanged from the 1B4B. But, the Vam 1B4C is the first use of the Rev Of D2a" Do earlier coins in the sequence have a different reverse die?

Am I confused, or is this saying the VAM 1B4B has 2 different reverse dies - with and without the gouges (also the gouge extending from the bottom of left wing)

Morganman - Sent you a message

Sent a message to the seller that most of his Morgans up for auction looked to be counterfeit. Reply was that they had been checked out and I was thanked for my input.... https://www.ebay.com/sch/11116/i.html?_ssn=auctionista15&store_name=netdealsnet&_oac=1 Since I am always looking for 1891 date, I...

Happy Thanksgiving VAMmers.....

thanks for your effort - these don't look so good either...https://www.ebay.com/itm/295349344513?h ... SwQLJjeFJV

Recent addition to my Morgans, not exactly a pick, it was listed by the VAM (possibly by a regular from VAMWorld) but I liked it for the wear pattern. Seems to suggest possibly a tilted field not in the 1889o VAM 13a listing.

Had to laugh at the F/U. Don't those magicians Penn and Teller give out a F/U award on their TV show? (Fool Us trophy)

I'll check out my latest order back from ANACS. It has a couple of each graded 50 and 53. Maybe I can learn from those examples. My previous 4 orders had only 50, 55, and 58 in the AU grades, none in 53. thanks

I like it.... even if it is one of those "other" dollars LOL

I had to read the description of 8.3 vs. 8.0 a couple times.... very minor vs. minor ???? Really?? Sounds almost impossible to break that down.

Above 2 notes........Looks like most all of his Morgan listings are fakes

More by the same seller - check out the 88D Morgan - the reverse has letters under some of the letters as well s the D mint LOL https://www.ebay.com/itm/144812331066?h ... Sw-Ztjc9uS

https://www.ebay.com/itm/134329617877?hash=item1f46ab4dd5:g:Zv0AAOSwTfJjc9yg&amdata=enc%3AAQAHAAAAkG6LMozD7iLK29ExDL8JGiQiYm919hmxM3MCDi8kmnbchejNtlEhmXzxSg3rA0t1kBnXX8ENwEFIR1scRW25Z5d%2Bm4SQSwTJcrVXyZmIkDfiQVJrB6YbSKrmt7I961m3kSpA5KhlT0eOlzIzVgAm%2Fz%2BZ9C071ylBZpr8K8TH%2BnU76lflsj5SfOKcmBZrNPuYRA...

Like that toning, great looking Morgan.

Still looking for the elusive cud on the 1891 o VAM 8a.... this one showed up today, the crack makes its way to the denticles and the displacement is easily to see above the M. Aren't there a few other date/mm VAMs that are listed as cuds at this stage?

Just noting one of the current G.C. listings possibly has an incorrect VSS label on it... the 1891 o VAM 8a is stickered as 1890 o VAM 2a2 on reverse. Appears it and the 1890 o VAM 2a2 got the stickers mixed up.