VAMWorld 2.0

test

You're a good man sir!. I think for the time being a little more study from me is probably best , spent most of the day looking for the other coin # I was struggling with the ears on , Pretty sure I came up with what it most likely could have been 100 years ago ,,, The trouble is, {I think } with be...

vampicker Wrote " It's understandable, because it entails a great deal of work with minimal reward." As I am finding out that statement . probably holds true even from the beginning , However it would be Impossible for almost anyone new nowadays WITH OUT THE EFFORTS OF FOLKS LIKE YOURSELF ! THANK Y...

It would have helped if I had accurately taken pictures of what was important :lol: The clash too weak , the coin too worn out . i don,t even seem to be able to draw the lines on the MM very well ' :lol: ' gonna have to go look for die markers ;End of the day it wont matter cause i just wrote 30 buc...

nope

Might have been a 4 A maybe , too wore out to really attribute . i will look more .

But @keilg1 They say ignorance is bliss No its not, its embarrassing .

k don't just tell me how stupid I am cause my wife tells my German Shepard that all the time I'm on the 1881-o page and I will try to get the right number on this .Its little bit harder with circulated coins for the novice , I had no idea that the 27 was rare .. and like i said..... NOT

I am most impressed that the younglings are not just staring at Cell phones viewing snap chat or tik tok .Perhaps there is hope ...

Devinci seemed to have the light and shadow thing down ,,,,,, I however have not quite figured it out yet .[urlhttps://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/research/projec ... on_Shadows][/url]

Of course he wasn't dealing with technology and optics someone else invented ...

Always a constant battle with the silicone life forms and myself I blame the computer however it is definitely human error .

Perhaps the easiest one I though I had seen to attribute , would have been 1881-O VAM 27 double ear , the attributing page claims it is one and done... In hand with a 10X loupe it almost looked identical to the plate photos ,,,,, NOT :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I have been doing a little reconcili...

Might as well put these on here 1921-P

UPDATE ... coin has proven not to be VAM 20 .... obverse looks correct still even under magnification ...subsequent grading guess reduced to AU 50 on a good day ,, {Hopefully not cleaned} MINT mark and any doubling on reverse is completely wrong .... Moderate hit to make believe assumed value of RAW...

1-2-2023 Wow the mkt in silver & especially Crude oil took a real S only 1 trade day after gold & silver posting 7 mo highs. Crude also took a real crushing with the China Covid news, amid expectations for lower usages. People dying in hallways as no beds etc, and even then China pissed because U S...

I wonder if it gets any better to use the exact obverse and reverse of whatever you are trying to look at/ and overlay .... I'm going to play with the parlor trick some more just for fun ,. It is written there is nothing new under the sun somewhere ... I'm not trying to make some great discovery wit...

but i didn't use the correct date at all ..... i just don't have a true view picture of his same coin to be absolutely sure

Heck man I'm not gonna say your wrong at all .Truth is from my little experiment to day with the 10 minutes i had to print transparencies out I would think you are 100 percent correct . No "N" would be where he was thinking based on your explanation . and he most likely will not get credit for any k...

Thank you for the reply , I just didn't know if such a thing existed .I did not mean to ask so many questions all at once . After I performed the little parlor trick things really began to actually make sense . I mean I've read a little bit about the subject but know very little other than just read...