Search found 2091 matches
- Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:30 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: tail feathers
- Replies: 11
- Views: 265
Re: tail feathers
My best guess is he's referring to the 21-S scribbles page, but I don't see an actual question posed
- Thu Mar 16, 2023 8:13 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921P D1 reverse Vam Help please
- Replies: 30
- Views: 373
Re: 1921P D1 reverse Vam Help please
This thread is about a perfect illustration of why some of us spoke up and advocated for further research into scribbles when Van Allen asked us if it was worth pursuing. For many, many 21's it's the only unique die feature
- Thu Mar 16, 2023 2:59 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921P D1 reverse Vam Help please
- Replies: 30
- Views: 373
Re: 1921P D1 reverse Vam Help please
Yeah, focus on your scribbles shot and forget the other stuff
The lines on the arrowhead are in the master die
The lines on the arrowhead are in the master die
- Thu Mar 16, 2023 2:58 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921P D1 reverse Vam Help please
- Replies: 30
- Views: 373
Re: 1921P D1 reverse Vam Help please
You're going to need other stuff. That quad spread is from one of the master dies or working hubs. It appears on multiple varieties
- Thu Mar 16, 2023 11:40 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: guess which 1888-O
- Replies: 45
- Views: 948
Re: guess which 1888-O
I'd think it's a safe assumption that the long die scratch thru AMERICA exists independent of the clashing. That marker has been listed for years now and it is how the Harrison 0 stage was located in the first place. An example without the clash would likely shuffle the deck
- Tue Mar 14, 2023 10:06 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: OOPS
- Replies: 12
- Views: 279
Re: OOPS
That is one evil assed spot!
- Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:45 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S Vam 62 (Long Nock)
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1103
Re: 1878-S Vam 62 (Long Nock)
Great find. Looks like virtually original surfaces in the photos
- Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:13 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1900-O VAM-54
- Replies: 6
- Views: 167
Re: 1900-O VAM-54
You guys know the deal with 'two-fer' discoveries. As much as some of you don't like these, something like the VAM 54A would also be the VAM 54 discovery piece. It's not a huge stretch that this die pair would exist without the breaks that define the later stage. The actual VAM listings are official...
- Mon Mar 13, 2023 10:41 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1900-O VAM-54
- Replies: 6
- Views: 167
Re: 1900-O VAM-54
VAM 54 isn't delisted. It's marked as 'unconfirmed' unofficially.
- Mon Mar 13, 2023 7:39 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Howard's coin ????
- Replies: 6
- Views: 216
Re: Howard's coin ????
At least some of this is PMD. particularly the diagonal stuff. I'd think it's better than 50-50 that all of it is damage from impact within its bag
- Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:00 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: DARKSIDE 1922 S VAM 10
- Replies: 7
- Views: 154
Re: DARKSIDE 1922 S VAM 10
Count me as a fan
- Sun Mar 12, 2023 11:53 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: guess which 1888-O
- Replies: 45
- Views: 948
Re: guess which 1888-O
Yeah, this specific reverse is part of a larger story and is noted for other markers. Fun!
- Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:33 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: LSD, baby, on an EDS?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 261
Re: LSD, baby, on an EDS?
That's funny, it actually has the little dot inside the ear. VAM 36.1
- Fri Mar 10, 2023 3:56 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: LSD, baby, on an EDS?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 261
Re: LSD, baby, on an EDS?
Pretty certain LSD counts as artificial toning
- Wed Mar 08, 2023 2:12 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Checkmark mystery
- Replies: 19
- Views: 417
Re: Checkmark mystery
The revised listing is now official and notes the checkmark. Thanks for the heads up about the reported discoverer possibly being inaccurate. I'll leave his name out of the column. I haven't written it yet but it will be in Coin World towards the end of April. And a special thank you to Brickie Your...
- Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:11 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Checkmark mystery
- Replies: 19
- Views: 417
Re: Checkmark mystery
Nope, the first guess was spot on. 80 Philly VAM 44. All the attention goes to the eye, which is understandable. Not sure I noticed the clear checkmark on this until I was shooting pictures for my next column a couple of days ago.
- Mon Mar 06, 2023 10:03 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Checkmark mystery
- Replies: 19
- Views: 417
Checkmark mystery
OK, so I know what it is, but do any of you recognize this? It's listed for another feature or two
- Mon Mar 06, 2023 7:45 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1882S Obverse of V3 Reverse of V8
- Replies: 19
- Views: 284
Re: 1882S Obverse of V3 Reverse of V8
The office would have them now. When your status changes to consultant, then they are sitting on my desk
- Mon Mar 06, 2023 4:06 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: I and R numbers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 241
Re: I and R numbers
I remain glad to be rid of them and still feel my vote to kill these off was the right choice. The original intent of Van Allen and Mallis with these was helpful, but over the past twenty years or so, there have been individuals that had used the I/R numbers to grossly inflate prices targeting newer...
- Mon Mar 06, 2023 12:17 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Trying to pinpoint my (weakly struck?) 1921 Morgan.
- Replies: 15
- Views: 287
Re: Trying to pinpoint my (weakly struck?) 1921 Morgan.
Weakness at the date and lower stars is a striking issue and not related to any specific variety. Without any scribbles or a recognizable crack pattern you'll be stuck with a generic VAM 3 designation.