Search found 2983 matches
- Mon Jan 30, 2023 3:58 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921-D JOH-25 Small Breaks D, S and S
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1125
Re: 1921-D JOH-25 Small Breaks D, S and S
The huge problem is, the 1921-D Die Crack Break Guide is horribly not up to date. Only 77 different VAMs are represented in it, out of the 228 that currently exist.
- Sat Jan 28, 2023 7:19 pm
- Forum: What's it Worth?
- Topic: 1921 S vam 1B3 in AU53
- Replies: 3
- Views: 237
Re: 1921 S vam 1B3 in AU53
I have no prices in my database for VAM 1B3 (which is scarce)... I only have prices for 1B3A (which is ultra-rare). I am skeptical about which VAM the cheapest two sales in the list below actually were, because the prices weren't appropriate: 1921-S 1B3A 62 PCGS Aug-12 H $3,055 1921-S 1B3A 55 ANACS ...
- Sat Jan 28, 2023 6:53 pm
- Forum: Buy, Sell, Trade
- Topic: GC; 78 PCGS AU-58 V-44A & more
- Replies: 17
- Views: 643
Re: GC; 78 PCGS AU-58 V-44A & more
This is what's known as hijacking a thread.
Very inconsiderate.
Very inconsiderate.
- Sat Jan 28, 2023 3:53 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Thank you ANACS!!
- Replies: 25
- Views: 529
Thank you ANACS!!
... for the best (and very unexpected) award 'plaque' ever. I didn't attend the recent FUN show and VAM Thing meeting, so it was a huge surprise when I received the email about this: 2022 SSDC Set Award.jpg The picture that was sent doesn't begin to compare to how wonderful it is in hand, and I can'...
- Sat Jan 28, 2023 2:56 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: '21-D JOH-22 photos (UPDATE)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 248
Re: does 21-D JOH-22 have a VAM #?
small lines in left wing.jpg The first scribbles photo shows something I have never seen before. Some of the little diagonal gouges indicated across the bottom show up individually somewhat regularly on both 1921-Ps and Ds (especially #1, #2, #5 and #8), but never all together and in such an appare...
- Sat Jan 28, 2023 2:49 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: '21-D JOH-22 photos (UPDATE)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 248
Re: does 21-D JOH-22 have a VAM #?
I received my JOH-22 and here's what I found:
- Fri Jan 27, 2023 8:41 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1891-CC VAM-3 (or is it - HELP!)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 211
Re: 1891-CC VAM-3 (or is it - HELP!)
It is VAM 3.
- Tue Jan 24, 2023 4:24 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: How Morgan Dollars Became Indian Ruppees
- Replies: 9
- Views: 553
Re: How Morgan Dollars Became Indian Ruppees
Fascinating to learn this!
I knew the U.S. sold a LOT of silver to Britain during WWI for geopolitical reasons in India, but did not know it was used to make coins. We almost need to consider the 1919 Rupee for honorary status in the Morgan Dollar set.
I knew the U.S. sold a LOT of silver to Britain during WWI for geopolitical reasons in India, but did not know it was used to make coins. We almost need to consider the 1919 Rupee for honorary status in the Morgan Dollar set.
- Sun Jan 22, 2023 10:15 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921D 1CL or 1CL2 with die file lines
- Replies: 11
- Views: 160
Re: 1921D 1CL or 1CL2 with die file lines
Your die cracks + feed finger lines tells me it's 1CL2.
Pretty coin.
Pretty coin.
- Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:04 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921D 1CL or 1CL2 with die file lines
- Replies: 11
- Views: 160
Re: 1921D 1CL or 1CL2 with die file lines
Feed finger gouges 'wandered' a bit during the course of their lives; photos on the attribution pages aren't a must match exactly proposition.
- Sun Jan 22, 2023 6:28 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: '21-D JOH-22 photos (UPDATE)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 248
'21-D JOH-22 photos (UPDATE)
I know it's an esoteric question, but with all the excellent cracks on both sides I'm hoping maybe someone has already sent one to @vampicker or @messydesk for evaluation.
- Sat Jan 21, 2023 11:03 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Please consider for DISCOVERY
- Replies: 28
- Views: 660
Re: Please consider for DISCOVERY
He is just following the new DC guideline of posting it here for more eyes to evaluate first, as opposed to simply sending it to @vampicker or @messydesk where it might slow things down in their lives. I say bravo for following directions.
- Sat Jan 21, 2023 6:07 pm
- Forum: Buy, Sell, Trade
- Topic: 1878 PCGS for sale Revised
- Replies: 5
- Views: 363
Re: 1878s for sale
Thanks Lee!
They have been added.
They have been added.
- Sat Jan 21, 2023 4:53 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Rotated Reverse Morgans
- Replies: 3
- Views: 186
Re: Rotated Reverse Morgans
Rotation alone does not make for a VAM. Other factors specify which VAM it is; rotation is just a bonus.
- Fri Jan 20, 2023 9:09 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1881 S VAM 54B WOUNDED EAGLE
- Replies: 12
- Views: 265
Re: 1881 S VAM 54B WOUNDED EAGLE
Same here!
Congrats!!
I'm still trying to find one.
- Fri Jan 20, 2023 5:20 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921-D VAM 1G: are these still unknown?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 188
Re: 1921-D VAM 1G: are these still unknown?
I'd just be guessing, and doubt that would be particularly helpful at this point. At a minimum, I'd want to see more examples for some context. Do these occur on other die pairs? In other series? Thanks John. I haven't seen them on other die pairs or in other series... just on VAM 1G. But it is on ...
- Thu Jan 19, 2023 10:36 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Show off some of your best vams!!
- Replies: 101
- Views: 2658
- Thu Jan 19, 2023 7:43 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921-D VAM 1G: are these still unknown?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 188
1921-D VAM 1G: are these still unknown?
Part way down the attribution page for 1921-D VAM 1G http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/wiki/1921-D_VAM-1G is a photo of strange 'dents' under the denticles above IBU on the obverse, and a note that says: "George Powell made a cool find in July 2004. Look closely at the holes be...
- Thu Jan 19, 2023 7:24 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Show off some of your best vams!!
- Replies: 101
- Views: 2658
- Mon Jan 16, 2023 7:44 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: OT: Whoops!
- Replies: 11
- Views: 377
Re: OT: Whoops!
Another chink in the Emperor's armour.