VAMWorld 2.0

What Chris said.

Someone is selling one on another site in a NGC holder MS 65, declaring it to be one of a kind!
Maybe not unique??

Thanks for both answers and John you added additional info not on link.

I stumbled on a 1885 Proof Morgan Dollar Judd 1747 and was surprised because I had no idea the mint would be playing around with experimental dollars after 1877-1878 finalizing the original design. Also noted the weight of 26.64 grams with a lettered edge (E Pluribus Unum) instead of reeding. The pa...

Hello, I was perusing the PCGS Forums earlier today and someone posted a link to the NGC coin grading contest at FUN Show in January. Awards for top 100 contestants. I checked back later and it must have been poofed by admin. Anyways I think I got a slot for Thursday 11 AM. Anybody else see it and r...

TTT

OK its a vam 35

thanks Lee

Looking at a 1904-O Paramount red holder I noticed mine has a counterclash. Is there any other
counterclashed 04-O besides the 1B3? I'm not seeing the pitting on O-L or on bottom of wing.

Also where can I find a tutorial to post pics on VW2?

thanks
Tim

I'm looking to trade for 1878 Vam 210B2 in MS 62-63 and a Vam 116, 116A or 116B in MS 62 need to be slabbed. Here's what I have for trade bait: Also feel free to make offer if your so inclined. 1878-P 14.1A P40/VSS 14.2 N58/VSS 38 A58 AOH cleaned 41C P50/VSS 41C P62/VSS 42A P50/VSS 42A N62/VSS 121 A...

I was wondering about this vam as it was discovered in 2015, no pictures in description and not in
SSDC registry. Looking thru my inventory found a PCGCS MS 62 with VSS sticker.
Any info would be appreciated.

Thanks

Way to go Dennis!

JB
I’m sending six today.
Thanks

Is the new site capable of email notifications of PM's like VW1?

Thanks for the response Messydesk. In looking a little closer to the descriptions vams 31. 40 and 110 listed as obv 11/1-8, vams 162 and 145 obv 11/1-25 and vam 200 obv 11/1-39. Only mention of progression says vam 162 followed vam 145. On my examples, I noticed not all had the same star doubling an...

Was wondering what the consensus of die progression of the 6 Obverses were?
Do they follow numerical order?
31-40-110-145-162-200
thanks in advance

I think rules should stay the same, similar to PCGS forums. JMHO