VAMWorld 2.0

twohawks wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 10, 2021 3:17 am

I know I just thought it was funny, I sent in 3 1921 S and got back 2 and 1 extra 1921 P

I'm going to guess that this 1921-S only gets designated as a 1921-S if it is also attributed as a VAM, which, of course, requires a VAM attribution fee. Was that the case with this particular coin?

Looks like a 1921-S VAM 6B Missing S mint mark.

RogerRock wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 08, 2021 12:03 am

Brian - Many THANKS for sharing these pictures !

Ditto that! They are much appreciated.

Very sad news.

I bought a BU roll from BigJayVee early last month – the first time we had done business together. It was a flawlessly smooth transaction and he was a kind, helpful and knowledgeable man.

Rest in peace, and best wishes to all of his family and friends.

vamsterdam wrote: ↑

Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:10 pm

is this item struck into the die, or is it something that was struck onto, and retained on the coin?

It is a recessed-into-the-coin impression.
The first photo gives the optical illusion of being raised, as often happens with photos of the LIBERTY letters on the headband.

DROOL!

What a haul Brent! Congratulations.

Messydesk would know for sure.
I've always assumed it was late state die erosion.

We in the coin universe might be interested to know about the mayhem that has been going on lately in the sports and trading card world – specifically at PSA, the card grading brother of PCGS. It is something to keep in mind whenever we think the cost of grading our coins is too high. In 2020, Covid...

I had the pleasure of having dinner with Leroy and Marilyn one evening. She was a dear, sweet lady.

When all of the "lists" were put together, some easy coins were intentionally included... coins that people could find that might get them excited about the lists as a whole. Had the lists consisted only of very rare coins, very few people would have found very few of them, they would probably get f...

You neglected to mention it's a 1921-D in your first post. That changes things a lot when it comes to a prooflike question. D-mint 1921s are extremely rare and highly sought after. Unfortunately, judging whether any 1921 Morgan is PL or not is essentially impossible by pictures alone. I personally w...

That obverse is extraordinarily well struck. What does the reverse look like? I believe it will turn out to be a D1 reverse, due to the small 'dot' to the right of the base of the 1st 1 in the date..

Fake 1893-S in a fake PCGS holder. Real coin sold in 2009 in a David Lawrence auction https://www.davidlawrence.com/rare-coin/274346/# https://www.ebay.com/itm/1893-S-PCGS-VG10-Key-Date-Morgan-Dollar/164787274047?hash=item265e16413f:g:MUsAAOSwlPRgYe5Y 0-feedback seller joined ebay March 17, 2021. He...

alefzero wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 28, 2021 4:44 am

Looks like it was struck through some sort of fabric overall too.

VAM 79 has a spectacular number of heavy horizontal polishing lines:

Looks like a cleaned VF.

A PCGS-45 sold for $63 at Heritage in 2018
An NGC-50 sold for $59 on eBay in 2020
A PCGS-53 sold for $71 in eBay in 2020
An NGC-55 sold for $76 on eBay in 2017

It's hard for me to see how this worth much more than $25-$30. And finding a buyer could be difficult.

More details needed.
Raw or certified?
And if certified, by whom?
If raw, does the coin have any problems?

I was shooting scribbles photos today of D1 reverse 1921-Ps. This caught my attention in a big way when I got to VAM 79:

Very interesting. Thanks for sharing this fascinating and previously unknown tidbit of Morgan history.

Thank you John.