VAMWorld 2.0

My lighting setup is stupid: a single goose neck lamp about 95% of the time; the other 5% is two lamps. I think the DSLR format has a lot to do with how lighting is captured, plus I'm shooting HUGE (roughly 30 MBs each) raw files that can be "tweaked" in MANY ways in Photoshop to help make desired f...

Those don't come up for sale too often. Here is everything I have since 2020: 1889-O 13B 62 ANACS May-23 E $754 1889-O 13B 58 PCGS Aug-20 E $500 1889-O 13B 58 PCGS Jan-22 E $351 1889-O 13B 55 PCGS Feb-23 E $176 1889-O 13B 55 ANACS Jun-22 E $115 1889-O 13B 53 ANACS Aug-22 E $250 1889-O 13B 53 PCGS Ja...

Here is everything I could find... and it isn't much:

I figured showing the date and the mint mark positions would be a start to whatever VAM it is. The diagonal gouge between the left wing and body was the only thing I noticed while taking a semi-slow look. I'll try again (pretending it's a 1921-P) and see if I can find anything else.

Wow!!
Thanks for adding to the thread.

UNCLE BINGO wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 09, 2023 2:08 am

Hello Mr. D Im gonna need more of your most excellent pictures if you would like my best guess at the correct VAM number on this one sir ???????

What part(s) of the coin would you like to see?

The wiki that VAMworld uses limits photos to a maximum size of 1200 pixels wide or tall, which is why you can't post huge images. Contact @messydesk for more details.

UPDATES:

• 4 more PLs sold on eBay last night (two auctions, two coins per auction).
• There have also been two Unc. details coins sold on eBay.
• Of the 29 coins on eBay, one dealer accounts for 26 of them.

Because I make new entries into my VAM sales database every day, I notice things. What I've noticed lately is a bunch of 1878-P 8TF VAM 23s -- mostly PLs and DMPLs -- have come out of the woodwork. In less than 3 months I have entered 24 VAM 23s that have sold on eBay alone, including seven separate...

Welcome Tony. It would be a waste of money to send in that coin for grading. The issue of details, or problem, coins comes up fairly regularly. There is no one-size-fits-all answer. Problem coins in general are looked at very unfavorably by the majority of collectors. I myself have only bought two i...

Still looking for some insight into what is going on with this coin.

This is my setup: Nikon DSLR, 60MM micro lens, 2 extension tubes, excellent copy stand, cable release, RAW file sizes setting, mirror up setting, Photoshop. I get about 4x lifesize at closest focus point.

Is this doubling on this 1879-O? It's only on TES and OF, and at the outer tip of the eagle's left wing – and only the S shows it across the full height of the letter. The stuff on the top of the O is extra strange because it's oblong, and it's not of uniform width above any of the letters. Any sugg...

bhinkle wrote: ↑

Sun May 28, 2023 8:46 pm

I tried to see that perfect oval blob, with just my loupe, but I didn't see it.

That blob on my coin is crud/debris/junk that shouldn't be there, so It's good that your coin doesn't have it -- and I wish mine didn't.

I agree with 62

Yes, my coin has the "stuff" in front of the neck (along with an unfortunate blob of crud): neck.jpg And it has the dot inside the top loop of the 1st 8: dot in 8.jpg Here's a shot of the flakey eye with the light coming from a different direction, which really accentuates the yellow/orange toning h...

You can basically ignore the necklace dashes as being of any help pointing to a specific VAM. They are extremely common on 1921-P D1 reverse VAMs – much more of an odd curiosity from the die-making process, rather than anything close to being a helpful pickup point to help make an attribution. What ...

Congratulations on finally acquiring that prize. It looks very nice for a details coin.

vampicker wrote: ↑

Fri May 26, 2023 7:38 pm

Still say that should have been named 'stink eye'

"Flaming Devil Eye" has always been my preference.