VAMWorld 2.0

Just picked up a NGC Mint Error 63 78-S with a neat reverse lamination at 6:00 on reverse; yeah lamination errors aren’t worth much of a premium but this is V 17DS2; polish lines above bow; tied as top in pop for the die state…

Best wishes!!

🥳 !!!

Creepy! Broken star narrows the field a lot; fortunately not something rare… maybe 135

Not CAC worthy; maybe needs a - added to grade

62; don’t like the black stuff or the obv mark below the chin; i.e., no eye appeal; as this is a common as dirt V33, I wouldn’t want this as part of my set!

🤮

Kurt28 wrote: ↑

Mon May 02, 2022 8:24 pm

I wsh they could talk

I don’t know about you, but I am worn out…

PR 0 details?

IMO, the variety is not hard to find; most are PL; owned several; clashed LDS are tougher again IMO. So, I am in The Grey Sheet crowd…

Well, I am not up to the 50 coin challenge, but John's work has given me food for thought for expanding my 1878 model year dollar set; looks like that would be roughly another 25 or so holes to fill..

Great die study and reference!

Bump

Mercer Consumer

Used for many years.

Material kept in bank vault; get asked every year on renewal where kept; suspect it would be higher if kept elsewhere.

Wood you believe that

Thanks again, Brent!!

When new 78-s v115 added, 78-s set is ok, but 313 coin specialty set , First Year Morgan - Basic, the coin occupies the 78-s V1E slot

When recent 79-S rev 78 v135 was added (old V35a, which wasn’t part of the set), it now occupies both V134 and V 39 slots.