
Search found 914 matches
- Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:06 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: O/T Taxman
- Replies: 6
- Views: 56
Re: O/T Taxman
Well did some more looking and it looks like state where I’ve had recent purchases sent (different from legal residence) DOES add 8%. Shame on me. Oh well. No more purchases sent there… 

- Thu Jun 30, 2022 11:02 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: O/T Taxman
- Replies: 6
- Views: 56
Re: O/T Taxman
So WHO reaps the reward of the extra $$ paid?? Especially when neither state requires, does the seller get a hidden profit? 

- Thu Jun 30, 2022 10:43 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: O/T Taxman
- Replies: 6
- Views: 56
O/T Taxman
Has something changed on eBay? My last two coin (not bullion) transactions have had sales tax added; in one case neither the dealer state nor the state being shipped to require sales tax on coins. The other case, the state of sale has 7%, but get charged 8%. State being shipped to does not require t...
- Wed Jun 29, 2022 11:57 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: finished my 1921 mint mark set!
- Replies: 9
- Views: 117
Re: finished my 1921 mint mark set!
Can you provide a closeup pic of words Made in China?
- Sun Jun 26, 2022 8:54 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: PCGS Frustration
- Replies: 13
- Views: 342
Re: PCGS Frustration
I submitted 3 coins, separate orders; 4/14 process date. I got the 1st back in a little over 3 weeks; simple re-slab as the original rattler holder encountered the bank vault floor :cry: Next was a PCGS graded and slabbed 1878 as MS 62 I wanted slabbed as an error due to a dropped letter on the reve...
- Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:46 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S VAM-17 EDS?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 135
Re: 1878-S VAM-17 EDS?
Hit List 40 (and Hot 50 & Top 100) designation rests solely with the associated books’ authors.
- Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:22 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S Vam 1, 54, 61, 67 maybe 91, 85 and 94 need to be reviewed
- Replies: 21
- Views: 621
Re: 1878-S Vam 1, 54, 61, 67 maybe 91, 85 and 94 need to be reviewed
So if the Fogie specimen of v85 is the Discovery coin, that should seal its fate . The SEGS 62PL V91 is registered in the SSDC registry so not lost. Thanks to Brian for reaching out to Larry. Maybe more info will be shed. Not sure how v1 can be reconciled; similar v2 is already gone… Progress is in ...
- Thu Jun 16, 2022 10:55 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S VAM 58 SP65
- Replies: 8
- Views: 266
- Thu Jun 16, 2022 10:50 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: OT just a bit!
- Replies: 14
- Views: 282
- Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:29 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Very Rare 1882 CC Morgan Off-Center
- Replies: 5
- Views: 233
- Sun Jun 12, 2022 7:33 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: A visit with Leroy
- Replies: 19
- Views: 548
Re: A visit with Leroy
Thanks for sharing!!
- Sat Jun 11, 2022 11:09 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Another 78-s v96 issue
- Replies: 2
- Views: 108
Re: Another 78-s v96 issue
Thanks, Brent; also good feedback for me going forward!
- Fri Jun 10, 2022 11:37 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Mirror mirror part 1
- Replies: 5
- Views: 187
- Fri Jun 10, 2022 10:16 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Mirror mirror part 1
- Replies: 5
- Views: 187
Mirror mirror part 1
Finally started sending many of my unattributed dollars to VSS to be properly attributed. Thanks VSS!!
Enjoy!
Row 1: 1 6 12 14.2A 18
Row 2: 85 165 221.1 221.3. 228.6
Row 3. 228A 164 230.3 79-S 51 79-S 52
Enjoy!
Row 1: 1 6 12 14.2A 18
Row 2: 85 165 221.1 221.3. 228.6
Row 3. 228A 164 230.3 79-S 51 79-S 52
- Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:35 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Another 78-s v96 issue
- Replies: 2
- Views: 108
Another 78-s v96 issue
V96 is still missing from the big P,Cc,S 1878 1st year basic super set. I added my specimen back to my 78-S set.
- Fri Jun 10, 2022 12:32 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S Vam 1, 54, 61, 67 maybe 91, 85 and 94 need to be reviewed
- Replies: 21
- Views: 621
Re: 1878-S Vam 1, 54, 61, 67 maybe 91, 85 and 94 need to be reviewed
Agree with the review; a couple appear in the registry; a plea to post photos and for a review to see if attributions are indeed correct.
- Thu Jun 09, 2022 10:15 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S Vam 1, 54, 61, 67 maybe 91, 85 and 94 need to be reviewed
- Replies: 21
- Views: 621
Re: What happen to 1878 S Vam 96?

- Wed Jun 08, 2022 11:14 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S Vam 1, 54, 61, 67 maybe 91, 85 and 94 need to be reviewed
- Replies: 21
- Views: 621
Re: What happen to 1878 S Vam 96?
All specimens from all sets disappeared; pop now -0-
- Sat May 21, 2022 10:09 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 2 for 1 78-S
- Replies: 2
- Views: 278
- Fri May 20, 2022 1:18 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 2 for 1 78-S
- Replies: 2
- Views: 278
2 for 1 78-S
Just picked up a NGC Mint Error 63 78-S with a neat reverse lamination at 6:00 on reverse; yeah lamination errors aren’t worth much of a premium but this is V 17DS2; polish lines above bow; tied as top in pop for the die state…