VAMWorld 2.0

I need to give credit to Fogie who pointed out these duplicates and sent me the coins to examine. Coins in hand definitely make life easier.

I went through a handful of "listing clean-up" coins today and fixed some stuff in 82-O. 82-O VAMs 1B, 26, 26A, 42, and 42A are all the same die pair. VAM 42 is listed with C3a, but Leroy’s picture is of a VAM 26A with the crack under the 1. Both earlier (no crack) and later die stage (lots of crack...

I've had a couple inquiries about the next bulk Morgan & Peace dollar submission. When in doubt, I always have one open, but I figured I'd make a more formal announcement. My fee is $6 plus shipping, PCGS's will depend on the grade they assign to the coins, which means I won't know total costs until...

tj52 wrote: ↑

Sat Jul 02, 2022 6:44 pm

I wonder if this has anything to do with it? If it is, I'd say it's time to "DUMP" Whitman!!!

Nothing to do with it. The CPG is put together by a large committee and from what I hear it can be a rather contentious process.

Send it. I can't find the scribbles in all of Leroy's photos.

So can we speculate that the 78-S B2 minting process started on May 15? No. There were only 4 B1 reverses that produced coins in the second shipment of 15 die pairs received April 26. The rest of the production was B2, so either 11 of those reverses were unusable or some were B2. Due to die sequenc...

Damage. If it were a strike-thru, it would show on the eye. Damage may skip over the eye since it's slightly protected by the eyelids being higher relief.

Progress! Both remaining orders are in Encapsulation status! BTW, took advantage of a slab error not noticed by the dealer; bought a ‘62 1878 V203 slabbed as Rev of 1878. That happens quite often IMO. :shock: That's probably the most common mislabeling that comes back from bulk grading, although 18...

Where did this come from: "We also know that the VAM 57 and 26 used the same reverse." This statement clearly says VAM 26 and 57 used the same ("identical')reverse....or is that supposed to refer the the REV HUB design not the specific die? Think it was simply a typo and he meant obverse. The three...

Gonna need a picture.

April 29, 1878, telegram from Linderman:
"Requests that five standard silver dollars of the coinage be forwarded."

JohnGoldsmith wrote: ↑

Thu Jun 30, 2022 12:54 am

Also if your into modern, will need one with the P and W. And if you gold plate any you will also need a C and a D.

Don't forget the ones made in Manila.

You have an O mint?

The telegram saying how many dies were condemned doesn't really say how many were used through 4/20. Many could have been deemed useless before being put in a press. We do know that one that was used and condemned was the VAM 60 obverse. We also know that the VAM 57 and 26 used the same reverse obve...

... Further the word "Specimen" is undefined and has no meaning. This is a recurring problem exacerbated by the fact that TPGs want a two letter abbreviation to put in front of the numeric grade to tell us all about the coin. Fortunately, the word "special" also starts with "SP," and that comes in ...

The line bordering the denticles is simply a remnant of the die preparation and nothing special. A full picture of the obverse and reverse would help in attribution.

My world submission just went to grading this week after over 2 months in "received." Thinking I'm not getting grades before the June 30 registry deadline.

Reeds from another coin.

Yeah, that's a nasty one.

vampicker wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 24, 2022 10:37 pm

Wow, think you're right. Looks a little different in a higher grade. But, there's enough there to convince me it's a match. Thanks!

The scratches in the upper tail feathers don't look like a match from here, but you have the coin.