Search found 3226 matches
- Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:41 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: PCGS Frustration
- Replies: 10
- Views: 209
Re: PCGS Frustration
My world submission just went to grading this week after over 2 months in "received." Thinking I'm not getting grades before the June 30 registry deadline.
- Sun Jun 26, 2022 4:43 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Interesting counterstamp. Anybody seen this before??
- Replies: 5
- Views: 84
Re: Interesting counterstamp. Anybody seen this before??
Reeds from another coin.
- Sun Jun 26, 2022 3:01 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1888 VAM 11A... but with a scratch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 67
Re: 1888 VAM 11A... but with a scratch
Yeah, that's a nasty one.
- Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:51 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Anyone recognize this 79-S?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 122
- Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:33 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: OT - A Cool Trade Variety
- Replies: 2
- Views: 65
Re: OT - A Cool Trade Variety
Remember that it takes many hubbings to completely sink the design into the dies. Given the relief contour of the stars (wider at the base than the high points), a first hubbing from a Trade Dollar hub would give smaller stars, which would grow over the course of the rest of the hubbings. Class I, I...
- Fri Jun 24, 2022 4:44 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: USPS question
- Replies: 7
- Views: 158
Re: USPS question
No need to delete. There's no expectation here that people read other forums for answers to questions like this. Also, the reference to certified mail is incorrect. That offers no protection other than proof of mailing and acceptance by the recipient.
- Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:07 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: USPS question
- Replies: 7
- Views: 158
Re: USPS question
This topic covered quite extensively on the PCGS forum. It seems coin related claims will not be honored unless they are sent certified mail. About 6 months ago, someone posted the USPS paragraph outlining the policy but I can't find it at the moment. Collectible coins are covered by USPS insurance...
- Wed Jun 22, 2022 8:42 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: R NUMBERS
- Replies: 1
- Views: 129
Re: R NUMBERS
Ignore R numbers. They were all estimates at the time of discovery of their respective varieties and more often than not are not terribly accurate. Moreover, they are not a reliable indicator of value. As of last December new varieties do not have R numbers.
- Mon Jun 20, 2022 9:07 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Availability of updates of the encyclopedia of Morgan and Peace dollars
- Replies: 2
- Views: 95
Re: Availability of updates of the encyclopedia of Morgan and Peace dollars
The last update to the VAM book was 1991. The number of varieties added and removed from the book in the last 30 years is more than what was in the book then. It's best to follow up with anything to match to the VAM book with a look in VAMWorld to see if anything has changed.
- Mon Jun 20, 2022 6:45 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S Vam 1, 54, 61, 67 maybe 91, 85 and 94 need to be reviewed
- Replies: 20
- Views: 570
- Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:08 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921-D VAM 1AO - is it valid?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 240
Re: 1921-D VAM 1AO - is it valid?
And with a few clicks and keystrokes, 1AO is eliminated.
- Fri Jun 17, 2022 9:23 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1921-D VAM 1AO - is it valid?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 240
Re: 1921-D VAM 1AO - is it valid?
Yup. VAM 1P. I see there's a VAM 1P1, 2, and 3 listed, too, and no real feeling for what the real die progression is among them. Obviously, with no die cracks, this should be VAM 1P1, and VAMs 1P2 and 1P3 would have to be sorted out.
- Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:35 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: OT just a bit!
- Replies: 14
- Views: 247
Re: OT just a bit!
No bears on my recent vacation.
- Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:31 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Morgan 1885-O Broken S
- Replies: 15
- Views: 315
Re: Morgan 1885-O Broken S
Given that hubs did break, such as the 'r' shown above, it's entirely possible that the "isthmus" of this s deteriorated on the hub over time, as it starts out very narrow. Nevertheless, it isn't a listable feature and shouldn't be used to guide attribution. VAM 17 looks correct.
- Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:28 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Amazing…
- Replies: 4
- Views: 243
Re: Amazing…
Couldn’t be an inside job? Well, let's see. It's a corrupt government with regions of the country controlled by drug cartels, which probably also exercise a lot of influence over ports. If the longshoremen in season 2 of The Wire were as corrupt as they were despite union pay and benefits (OK, fict...
- Thu Jun 16, 2022 7:17 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: 1878-S VAM 58 SP65
- Replies: 8
- Views: 239
1878-S VAM 58 SP65
A collector who bought this major rarity this year just posted a long thread about it on PCGS's forum. A few of us have seen the coin in person, and it's definitely special.
Link to PCGS Forum
Link to PCGS Forum
- Thu Jun 16, 2022 3:30 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: Morgan 1885-O Broken S
- Replies: 15
- Views: 315
Re: Morgan 1885-O Broken S
The 's' is irrelevant. Start with the date and the mint mark. Chances are if you were to remove the polish residue around it, the 's' wouldn't look broken, as this is normally a very thin part of the letter.
- Thu Jun 16, 2022 1:20 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: OT just a bit!
- Replies: 14
- Views: 247
- Wed Jun 15, 2022 1:36 pm
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: way OT: phone charger adapters?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 246
Re: way OT: phone charger adapters?
- Wed Jun 15, 2022 4:10 am
- Forum: Discussion Forum
- Topic: way OT: phone charger adapters?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 246
Re: way OT: phone charger adapters?
Might be a silly question, but does your car have a USB charging port in it?