VAMWorld 2.0

nice pickup. did it hurt your eyes looking at morgans?

messydesk wrote: ↑

Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:59 pm

This wouldn't be an older PCGS holder by any chance, would it?

it has to be. ive seen MANY holders that have lines like that showing through from imaging. always older holders. don't recall the specific generation(s).

thought i had a monster first time i saw it.

having one of these is better than picking some rare 8tf in unc!!

thanks for bearing the brunt and to all those whom have contributed.

gratz! you suck for sure.

i've hoped to find one in circ, unc was barely a consideration.

a general statement from the HPA states that coins manufactured before the date of the HPA's creation (1972/3) are exempt from it for buying and selling as well as any marking requirements.

love seeing these threads. crack/break map templates are priceless. truly

for those that want to tinker with such a thing, the process sounds virtually identical to some things i've done with paint.net. the ability to add/select/deselect layers is easy as checking a little box or not.

looks like unusual damage from the pic where you can see the whole obverse. with the neck taking a hit i would really lean towards a damaged but graded coin. almost thought counterfeit but didn't want to jump to conclusions.

yet another ultra-rarity.

21-s rev of 79.

came across another monster rarity recently.

78-cc rev of 79 large cc

nice.

always liked those radials.

WOW x3

I just acquired this piece. It has the same obverse die as other 1893-O Privately-Made, with the dash above the "B". congratulations! i got the links to work by deleting everything before the url address and thankfully as i really wanted to see that coin. designscomputed.com/coin_pics/VAM/DC_1893o_...

is the heritage coin double-struck or just have a LOT of recutting? perhaps one of the working dies spiffed up to strike some special pieces?

RogerB wrote: ↑

Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:15 pm

Does this help a little?[/b]

yes. it gets me where i need to go. ty again for taking the time.

hope not to get the thread more derailed than i have.

messydesk wrote: ↑

Fri Feb 26, 2021 3:02 am

Check this link from the 1878 page: 7/8 Attribution Guide.

The pictures are all quite usable.

i really like how often you link to the attribution pages. SO much time and effort has gone into those, it'd be a shame not to use em.

RE: "how are these numbers affected by shared dies between mints, different years of coins and reworked dies?" These were dies used by and destroyed by the San Francisco Mint for 1878. Mints did not share dies and there are no extant records about the quantities of repaired dies. All dies cycled th...

In 1878 The San Francisco Mint used 90 obverse and 84 reverse dies for the standard silver dollar. [ Ref: RG104 E-229 Box 16 of 17 ] how are these numbers affected by shared dies between mints, different years of coins and reworked dies? not looking for specifics, just general commentary. nice resu...

the 1 in date over a gap doesn't match up with all images on the page.

http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compu ... 84-O_VAM-5

I looked at that link 10 times and never clicked forward to see that reverse picture... its my 'I already know so much attitude' rearing its ugly head... took me a while to notice those arrows for secondary images. chasing down vam information, often rewarding and often exhausting and most often, s...

just because you said you wanted to see a collar clash and shoulder clash. 8-) http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/wiki/1922-P_VAM-2U1 http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/w/thumb.php?f=ARS_1922_P_V-2U1_02.jpg&width=855 do you know about the supplements? how a...

If you don't I am going to figure out how to send this ugly coin to Leroy. :popcorn: he isn't going to like that coin with gunk and will probably reject it. have you looked these lists over? http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/wiki/1922-P_Clashed_Die_Attribution http://ec2-13-58...