VAMWorld 2.0

nice grab.

The coin for which the VAM was listed is real, I have seen this in all TPG holders. That is not to say that a counterfeiter could not use this coin as a model for counterfeit dies. Hope this is helpful. BTW, this VAM is still available with enough looking. thanks for the confirmation. i think this ...

bump?

anyone have the most recent supplements to see what they say about this mysterious little lady?

i remember from a long time ago this was deemed not authentic, or so i think.

what is the update, if any for this little gal?

did a quick, basic search and got nothing.

http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compu ... 4-P_VAM-1F

gratz

gratz. as someone with a big handful of discoveries, it is no mean feat to do that many in one fell swoop!

i see the thing you think is the backbone of the E but for me, i couldn't commit to a yes from those images just because of how many ghost E clashes are out there. if you feel strongly about it though, toss it in an order with some other coin(s). it's only a little bit of money to have the big dog l...

felicitazioni !

nice example.

agree with the above. it looks a little rough for a rim cud but tough to tell from the images, not that they are bad.

i didn't see anyone else say it so; the lines west of the E in the pic above really look like PLS, someone for some reason wiping the coin enough to cause minor damage and i've seen a fair amount of otherwise lovely coins get detailed for small patches like that. there is a fingerprint in the area o...

you're gonna wanna dip that thing. looks like pvc both obv and rev.

raynat3 wrote: ↑

Thu Feb 09, 2023 12:02 pm

.

not sure when you switched to that stamp avatar but i was just looking through my collection recently and that one is one i stopped and oogled for a little while. i do really love the artist influences during that time period!

colwillys wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 08, 2023 3:17 pm

Yes i know this is a machine error .. A ANACS PROFESSIONAL says send to Dr. Close , so you Pro Vammer say No .

whom said no?

i re-read the thread and didn't see anyone say that.

If the reeding is otherwise normal (coin struck fully in collar) and there's additional reeding on the rim, it would be a collar clash, where the hammer die hit the collar die before striking this coin. It should be noted that initially, the collar clash is caused by vertical/horizontal misalignmen...

gratz

nice!

what a neat error to add.

since this is deep into page 4 of this thread...

i will share with the group the highly technical and complicated process of what happened to the die.

looking forward to see where this is going ! :) I'll probably list it as new. Waiting to hear from other 79-S specialists. The bit pointed to in the R above is just a hit on the coin. are the die(s) previously unknown or just a new die state/features? on a separate subject, kinda. if a die is used ...

looking forward to see where this is going!