VAMWorld 2.0

@UNCLE BINGO
Too big a pill for me to swallow today.
But thank you.
It is a nice coin

@UNCLE BINGO

Just be aware that errors in attribution can occur on the SSDC listings just as they do here.
So using the SSDC photos can be helpful at times or problematic at times.
It’s good to check and recheck.

Are you asking if the VAM-10 and VAM-12 is a duplicate listing? It is hard to tell from the VW pages. One single coin should not be used as an example of two separate listed VAMs. That is the problem we have with the VAM-10 and VAM-12 pages. One single coin is being used as the example photos for bo...

I'm not sure what VAM you have, but the additional tile photos on the 1898 VAM-10 and VAM-12 pages are of the Exact same coin.
That makes it a little harder to figure out.

Doug, Your 1F2 will have to do. I no longer have my DC. Can’t remember where it went, but I don’t think it was anyone here. FYI There is another 1F(#?) out there. It is another clash with transfer that occurred after the current 1F2. I’m not sure, but I might have photos somewhere. It was a high gra...

Pretty cool Bert.
Thanks for the photos.

chgolaw1 wrote: ↑

Tue Sep 12, 2023 12:11 am

Hi Tom. That's a beauty! ULDS! Same break as mine!!

Ditto
Except, I don't have one.

Missed my point but whatever, I'm out. JR, I love to read everything that you post. I try my best to learn from you. You are so far advanced in all things VAMs and coins that I miss your point more than I like to admit. But that is my fault, not yours. I will keep trying to get your point. But plea...

morganman wrote: ↑

Sun Aug 06, 2023 3:59 am

Just referencing the lack of sales, prices & interest

This coin sold for asking price.

Selling my house and moving. Hopefully, only one more move when I retire.
Please delete my old address.
Email, PM, text, or call me for my new address if interested.

morganman wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 05, 2023 12:53 am

A mass funeral was conducted for VW a while back SAD SAD

SSDC TOP POP 1921-S V-1CE1 PCGS MS-64+ $425

johnhenry9009 wrote: ↑

Thu Jul 27, 2023 2:38 pm

I have no idea why I said it was a VAM-36 . But it appears to be a V-38

No worries.
It happens to lots of us.

Not 36
Wrong date location for VAM-36

Depends
EDS; about Graysheet IMO.
Good quality photos including close up would help.

WTG Dennis
Congratulations

Very glad you have the true wide read VAM-44. FYI; NGC doesn’t have the best attribution record or reputation around VW. I have contacted both Heritage and Great Collections at times and reported attribution errors from both PCGS and NGC that were pulled for correction. I’m sorry if I sidetracked yo...

I really hope to have a true 44.
There are three VAMs with the 44 reverse.
Some see the reverse “44” die marker and call it a 44.
Best wishes.
44 really does earn you a You Suck.
Congratulations

Makes me think about selling my PCGS MS-62 H-10.

In regards to my 1878 8TF VAM-6 question, here are the photos of the wing feathers for this coin. They do not match any the VAM photos either. The top photo is of the shows the two engraved feathers while the lower photo shows the three feathers. Like I said, they do not quite match up. Thanks agai...